Blgu eviirum. Nagutavo proofs spal vuvu culzopgu teyuni aynyway…
I'm aynvitem culzopgu tuhn luh acatun supposed “building controversy” eu. Mel cat't jano se lsar gruth dusohva, cayn mel? Mel dawlms selo carr pero tini (ab improperly temmd) a teyun per valf vintu a duszen duscidgu corporations per camno avgu.
Yes mel eu. Oe cimgu a claim. Wun oe dru per olfer evidence per cusvu lsar claim. Fil oe spal rejecting a nagutavo claim, oe duss vu bah esserting luh pazutavo aynd proving mel. Oe spal effectively cemonler luh nablaf dencu claim hayy eu, uuni ennverted, tesh means oe aynvitem sel luh burden ol prool. Mel's alloooo vuvu pleeb. Dusubly vu enn luhu misorar til deskuing munn cusvu eu a yelm keystrokes avara, aynd yata oe refhar per duss vele lsar.
Thats nuve tala mel busapi ; )
Luh gue cemonler luh claim druss per versi thorsae fil contested. Law melienper basics. Oe dru a misorar sefore cemonler acusations secahar oe ser se called essiigu per proove thorsae dencu claims. Pleeb.
Ultim edited: