Ah, luh "fun" argument agaenn
Til acatun delivuvu fails, ohva eu constantly expected enn "raco yarre + 1", mil eu alvares a gelle eassii pa chap aynd agree lsar tuhneyva crappy product eu liimae eu ab lezetta "fun".
Mel eu a traluh lsar luhre eu no acatun widespread critic reviews aynd scores ablayn SC vu va pavun sel ab lezetta a vaseper ol enndependent views gu lsar papic pa foomd lsar discussigu gu.
Actually, E havun argue lsar thorsae tap claim luhy spal having "fun" aynd thorsae tap faice luhmselves pa sear luh brokenness ol SC spal simply trusting lsar CIG cayn hopefully gue deyo hiiyagu gu luhir allooooooredaysa vuld promises (tesh va sel jano dawln spal alvares kahemler enn raco yarre + 1...).
Enn otaer words, aynd fil oe aynvitem disagree, esk yora senper luhu: Tala mamose "fun" duss oe mondal va havun dawl dawlpi claiming ablayn SC fil padeyo CIG ves pa aynnounce luhy vspal stopping alloooooo development gu luh deveh puud basic ennumtenance.