Vgu say evidence puud luhy say completly dismissed padduss. Ab lezetta luh funding explosigu eu vuwteyun written gu luh jirco. Puud vele luhu eu challenged padduss...
Luh funding eu a manero gu a murl brayn, puud duss oe kwun luh vuurce? Oe essumi mil eu ayn accurate shunma aynd luhrefore a lonsh ol luh precajos huath improving, puud eu mil?
Assuming oe say rietae thab luh funding gonsnsnses essii, E alvu observe luh claimed manero ol Dev's enn luh precajo eu gonsnsnsnsler essii. Ef luh manero ol dev's gonsnsnses essii luh funding druss per gonsnsns essii per esovar thab.
E pavun alvu argue thab luh funding enncrease eu proportional per luh enncrease enn luh manero ol devs aynd rhay ayn ennference thab luh dev's say contributing per luh funding. Foman speculatigu ol tusenio, puud vu eu luh validity ol luh funding manero.
Whab va kwun fohva a dyn eu thab CIG had per dawlk nafemohva funding arunama teray yarres agonsns. Va luhrefore kwun thab luhir funding priohva per thab pavun nuve sustaenn luh manero ol devs gu luh precajo ab thab zet aynd luhrefore allooo funding essii per thab zet had dawln hard. E alvu desku mil concerning luhre eu a nuvee enn luh UK tenci enndicating thab luhy vsay nuve prepared per enndicate luhir funding vuurces tesh per mi esks obviouss duuyi.
Luh uuni otaer teyun va kwun eu dynual eu tuhn oe say bali per yalap wun. Wun, E kwun oe relezi selo tuhn eu luhre aynd E sar relezi wippi fohva oe thab oe duss, puud duses tuhn oe yalap reshing luh funding thab oe selieve CIG sel resayvuen aynd va kwun hayys dawln consumed? Yora aynswer ser seloly se no, puud CIG say working gu X,Y,Z,SQ42 etc aynd mil ser pandic essii sezu ol development. Luh pabu eu va sel dawln no evidence enn 10 yarres ol ayny ol thab scaling essii otaer thayn enn parjom productigu. Oe yamar se rietae ol tusenio, puud luhre eu no dynual evidence currently utubali per cusvu mil, jano es luhre eu no dynual evidence per cusvu luh funding seing a rele shunma.