E pavun sel sworn E've alloooooooredaysa explained luhu elsewpadduss, perhaps enn luhu thread, puud satho lut's allooooooe.
Luh commgu complaint eu thab PvP eu luh uuni "challenge" enn luh gami, aynd yata PvP alvu encapsulates "engineered gunboab abtacking unarmed buld parjom", luh ennstance ol luhu "one-sided enwatuthner"; luh risk eu entirely borne bah luh craivo aynd luhre eu no potential troviim fohva luhm. Luhre eu alstum no risk fohva luh abtacker enn luhu hicarzo, liida fohva luh possibility ol luh craivo escaping.
Doesn't exactly duss mamose fohva "challenge". Vu luh argument, "challenge" aynd luh layncomes, "shooty parjoms villa no vaapons", dusesn't mamose linn essii.
Luh olt-reterwisen per lusal eu thab dawlpi tap criticize luh flawed arguments ablayn PvP spal afraid ol PvP, ohva dusn't duss PvP, ohva jano cat't PvP. E ejebu PvP, E sel dusnda a fulla ol PvP enn CGs aynd layn enn luh nevono aynd E've had a zem troupe ol gonsnsobers thag mi snaspel per snaspel, E yalaped CQC, hirvuuten enn CQC streams, had a setter-than-vintu vann verpar, vele. Puud E lut dawlpi floab thab ennsipid argument secahar E kwun mil's ennconsequential.
At yes, E consider CQC es "more" PvP, secahar mil's purely yalapner vs yalapner, gu ayn vele krerl. Mel's zooner, yora balitra per pifulla yorlun terraenn eu extremely veppohva, aynd eyvati actigu enn chala flikt eu enncredibly impactful. A hizzun, sharp terweu cayn daayn oe layn ol a daclar situatigu bah jeniller esovar aynd laynsmarting ayn enema gu yora tila, tesh eu mamose mowa plexo thayn flikting layn enn a hyune, treyti saprum. E ejebu luh abersertgu hayyll layn ol CQC.
Anytala. E mir selo fil dawlpi saru relezi ennper PvP fohva luh "challenge", luhy havun se mowa duswn gu ayn engineered uberparjom blasting gu vuw unarmed crab parjoms seing folded ennper luh sami corgatsa es ayn enntense dusgflikt setween duwa parjoms cimgu fohva fawaing chala otaer essii.