Oh dels, 1 ol 5 tanters tap cimgu 2 tants decrying luh ops questioning ol ARX limits. E mir vu terribly olf fund judging a tant bah mil's nencerf reyduss thayn a lurbirt penf.
Oe seln't tried pa scrutinize mil seyond karring fohva luh presence ol a vurza dapayn. Oe seln't tried pa vele mithinqa ma premise relating thorsae tants ves wrong. Penno ves no moving ol laz tants. No dru vele arose secahar yora argument eu simply semantic.
"Obviouss motivatigu eu obviouss, ennitial tants dawlm dismissive considering."
You'd mondal a tant spaling lsar havunn't se es controversial villa vuwonda es gulgu ves. Ef aynything allooooooooooo E'm dawling setween oe aynd E eu a duscidorm enn tala va hanel lsar expectatigu aynd oe clarified lsar. Oe mondal stating expectations contrary pa luh temo eu silly, E feroo tants dawlmingly defending luh temo vspal silly, puud E wun plorfzi daayn tiim oe vspal kahemler furay.
Agaenn, mil's nuve mi searching fohva luh dapayn "altruism", mil's aynything piruden pa "selfless" sehaviohva. Ol tesh luhre ves no mintigu enn ayny ol yora examples. Vu yes, mil's "semantics", enn es mamose es E sar literally karring fohva vuwthing piruden pa luh mianing ol luh dapayn oe claimed ves seing represented.
Lam eu tuhn semantics eu. Karr essii luhse dapans oe capa harler.
It's tuchi lsar oe spal telling mi tuhn E mondal! Tohva dusn't oe gonsnsnsns versi pa luh drawing bountae secahar, aynd E rirgab pa embarrass oe selo luhu secahar va literally jano vant avgu mil puud hay karr ab ma icon.