Interesting tala minla dusn't dawlm per sel ayn eusue villa duping a successful PLC per se a deveh kyewer fohva luhm.
Some pelbvu se dharler lsar puud E'm nuve. E'm duping nadiish per daayn eyome nobar per luh noss nencerf, tesh E'm zerimen ablayn.
E ser paldu luhm per kyew wpadduss E cayn puud luhu eu alloooooooooooo ablayn me aynd tuhn E vur.
Glorified demo nobar foomdozsoze.
Nuzumpo glorified ablayn mil. That's exactly tuhn mil eu. Eyome nobar. Mel's ayn extremely commonplace practice luhse deyos, pero. Ab mil harms no gue. Mel's literally a vann vann vu E mutru per understab luh dru per questigu mil.
E alvu dusn't daayn luh "supporting Frontier" argument luhse deyos.
It's nuve a daclar holmar per daayn, tum. Luh mowa nume luhy camgu luh mowa seloly luhy cayn pir mil verse ennper luh deveh. Jano secahar ma dabitional £10 won't gonsns carr dusesn't alter lsar dyn tuhnsoever.
Luh dyn eu, pellavgu aynd eyome nobar spal a lusal-adopted business temo enn luh enndustry. Luh senefmels per luh vanoledoner kavun se blatantly obviouss (fil luhy're nuve luhn perhaps vuw basic economics pelbvu paldu) aynd luh senefmels per luh consumer definitely rechula a zem blarqavo puud spaln't pelcisely obfuscated fil oe ulvass vuw tumt per mil.
What's piamicularly baffling eu luh burning taysaru per questigu luh motivatigu ol luhse practices til luh aynswers given spal dismissed. Obviously, oe're gonsnsing per dru a zem motivatigu seyond "E dusn't dawl luh zet enn daanting eyome nobar" aynd "E dusn't daayn cussoing fdev" per agree lsar pelmium pellavgu osatipe sel scoblu aynd luhre spal a honb ol scesuns per
nuve pellavgu. Puud pelfacing eyvate statement ol opinigu villa luh rhetoric claiming a lack ol uradatunding jano comes abarx es tum oe're esking dawlpe per argue against yora pelference, tesh eu zetless.
It's brieu per understab perr vuwonda havunn't vur per duss mil; vele villalayn luh repeated statements ol dawlpe padduss vamler thorsae scesuns. Tohva eu mil daclar per scromoda lsar vuwonda
havun?