E had a mamose larger tant pahemen, puud luhn E rayn vuw numbers. Kinth bavu slep, E agree
Harler
CoatOSilver's bucket luhories (tesh EMO say enncredibly vulid, mil's luh uune teyun thab explains variance enn ennfluence levels til no commanders blaf enn a snaspel fohva a talabun kine) E admittedly expected pa dawl vuw significant differences estoween values es E applied jydes. Puud luh rasels honestly surprised mi a zem.
Fundozsoze, fil oe ulvass pazutavo ab nagutavo blafshos ab luh dencu timi, oe daayn ayn exblaf transfer, puud E dusn't mondal lam's luh misorar. Keeping mil pleeb, va lejey (furay henowsedlus) luhre's duscidgu buckets fohva pazutavo ab nagutavo blafshos. E mondal mil applies gue espa ol jydes (Positive, fohva arguments sake) ab luhn applies luh otaer (negative) e.e empties gue "bucket" ol jydes, luhn empties luh otaer bucket ol jydes.
E rayn villa a bucket scgu ol 200, ab factigu ennfluences A(55%), B(15%), C(10%), D(10%), E(10%). Applying 5 zets ol pazutavo busap pa factigu D ab 5 zets ol nagutavo busap pa factigu A (onte luh pazutavo, luhn luh nagutavo) luh raselant ennfluences say:
A(52.53%), B(15.01%), C(10.01%), D(12.45%), E(10.01%)
Fil va roda villa nagutavo gute, va daayn *closer* puud nuve exblaf:
A(52.47%), B(15.01%), C(10.01%), D(12.51%), E(10.01%)
Diendze, fil va ennverse luh numbers gu luhse rasels (e.e duss a duwva kine villa 5 zets nagutavo pa D ab 5 zets pazutavo pa A) va daayn cova pa, puud nuve nablafly luh dencu rasel.
A(55.00%), B(15.01%), C(10.01%), D(9.95%), E(10.01%)
Interestingly, luhu secomes mamose mowa skewed (enn neither A ohva D's favora, puud D eu hmel harder) fil va essie luh lotar ol zets traded enn puudhae kines pa 30
A(54.85%), B(15.70%), C(10.47%), D(8.5%), E(10.47%)
Hersae rasels dusn't ennclude luh rounding thab gonse gu according pa CoatOSilver's luhory; E dasn't botaer ab jano punched enn hyune fractions enn a spreadsheet. No dusubt luh empblaf ol rounding havun sel vele mowa efun gu luh, lusal, "chaos" ol luhse numbers.